Systematic Theology: Reformed Theology (footnote #2)

Within the ranks of Christ’s Church there are differences of opinions regarding eschatology (last things). Some of the differences are vast, irreconcilable, and mutually exclusive. Thankfully, these differences need not divide the Church. Though we cannot all agree, we can disagree about the secondary details and continue to love and affirm each other as brothers and sisters in Christ.

Do not misunderstand! Eschatology matters! That Christ is coming again is an essential doctrine of the Christian faith. To deny Christ’s second coming is to depart from the Christian faith. The details that lead up to His return, and exactly how He will return, however, are less clear and fall into the category of “doubtful things” (Romans 14).

How does Paul in Romans 14 instruct us to behave when it comes to doubtful things? Remain true to our convictions, and give those who hold opposing views the grace to remain true to theirs.

If we are both loving and mature, we can discuss our differences, and even engage in friendly intramural debate. But we must not condemn each other over these matters.

I would add that we should seek to learn all we can about other views. I was challenged by my former pastor who said to me, “You know everything about one view and are altogether ignorant that there even are other views.” He instructed me to learn what other Christians believe about eschatology. I took the challenge. And I changed my view, not once, but twice!

There happens to be four basic views about eschatology (that I’ll not expound here). If you want a little help to understand the important but not essential differences, click below:
Comparison between the four main views of the millennium in eschatology (CARM)

The Millennial Maze (Ligonier)